<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toolbox: Denotation And Connotation</title>
	<link>http://www.bettermuseums.com/2007/12/12/toolbox-denotation-and-connotation/</link>
	<description>Museum News &#038; Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Knut Skjærven</title>
		<link>http://www.bettermuseums.com/2007/12/12/toolbox-denotation-and-connotation/#comment-49</link>
		<author>Knut Skjærven</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bettermuseums.com/2007/12/12/toolbox-denotation-and-connotation/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Post provided by &lt;a href="http://barebonescommunication.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;barebonescommunication.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best wishes and a Happy New Year to YOU ALL&lt;br /&gt;
Knut Skjærven&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post provided by <a href="http://barebonescommunication.com" rel="nofollow">barebonescommunication.com</a></p>
<p>Best wishes and a Happy New Year to YOU ALL<br />
Knut Skjærven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should I be flattered? &#171; barebones communication</title>
		<link>http://www.bettermuseums.com/2007/12/12/toolbox-denotation-and-connotation/#comment-48</link>
		<author>Should I be flattered? &#171; barebones communication</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bettermuseums.com/2007/12/12/toolbox-denotation-and-connotation/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] . I starting reading some of them. One from an American site on Museums was interesting. It seems that I recognized some of the wording. It sounded very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] . I starting reading some of them. One from an American site on Museums was interesting. It seems that I recognized some of the wording. It sounded very [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
